BurrellesLuce
Express
75 East Northfield Road /
Livingston, NJ / 973-992-6600
| PUBLICATION: |
SUNDAY NEWS JOURNAL |
| DATE: |
03-02-2008 |
| HEADLINE: |
Del. legal academic sees time for a
change |
Del. legal academic sees time for a
change
Corporate governance director pushes for pro-investor tweaks to
state code
By MAUREEN MILFORD The News Journal
With his
gentlemanly demeanor, Charles Elson doesn't come across as a firebrand.
Indeed, most people would peg him as an Ivy League lawyer at a Manhattan
law firm. His bock-lined office at tlie Weinbeig Center for (Corporate
Governance at the University of Delaware only reinforces that irnage. The
lithograph of Harvard University hanging on the wall of his office is more than
a display of his academic pedigree. It's a symbol of what makes Elson tick.
Elson inherited the picture from his grandfather, Charles Goodman, a
Dartmouth graduate with a Master of Business Administration from Harvard.
Goodman was working on Wall Street in the summer of 1929, just before the stock
market crashed. When he retumed to Harvard in the faU, the world tumed upside
down and Goodman's WaU Street career ended. With no jobs available after
graduation, Goodman retumed to the family's textile business in Memphis, Tenn.
"That story stuck with me. When you think you got it down pat, you
don't. I keep that picture in my office as a reminder that nothing is stable and
set in concrete," Elson said.
Now, Elson, 48, who became the first
director ofthe corporate governance center in 2000, is raising questions about
Delaware's incorporations gold mine. He's publicly urging the state to consider
small changes to its corporate law code in response to growing calls for
greater rights for stockholders in public companies. Delaware has
created a near nionopoly on incorporations over the past century by quickly
tweaking its constitution, laws and court when the need arises. Today, taxes,
fees and other income paid by companies represent about one-third of Delaware's
budget.
"That's what an academic does," he said. "If you're not
challengmg people to think, you haven't done your job."
But Elson's call
to action failed to rouse some legal experts in Delaware, who urged caution,
saying.the state should not pass laws in haste. The so-called "Delaware Way" has
been to deliberate behind the scenes.
"The way the law has been changed
over the last 40 years has involved input from lawyers who represent
corporate clients and investors. It hasn't been done through public relations
campaigns," said Lawrence Hamermesh, director of the Widener Institute of
Delavvare Corporate and Business Law. "Any time we change the corporation law,
there isn't a whole lot of public debate about it."
Richard
Geisenberger, Delaware's assistant secretary of state and director of
corporations, which oversees the incorporations business, said he respects
Elson's right to express his individual view as a member of the academy. But
Geisenbei^er echoed the sentiments of some Delaware lawyers when he said the
university's corporate governance center wasn't created for the purpose of
advocating changes to Delaware law.
Some in the legal community have
suggested Elson isn't playing by Delaware rules.
"People have said to me
there is process in Delaware," Geisenberger said.
Elson did present his
views to the Delaware State Bar Association's corporations law section,
according to Edward Welch, head of the section. "In fact, he's following the
process. He subniitted his thoughts," Welch said.
To Elson, it boils
down to risk analysis.
"If I'm wrong, there's no downside," said Elson,
who is also a corporate director on two company boards. "If I'm right, there's a
real problem."
Saul Levmore, dean of the University of Chicago Law
School and Elson's former teacher, sees Elson as "a breath of fresh air."
"He believes Delaware should protect its asset, which is a near
nionopoly," Levmore said. "This is not a rebellion."
Mel Eisenberg, a
professor of law at the University of California School of Law, Berkeley,
See ELSON — F3
said he is bafiled that anyone could be upset
with Elson's push for pro-investor changes to the Delaware corporate code.
"Charles is not far out," in his views, Eisenberg said. "Maybe he's not
middle-of-theDelaware road, but he's middle ofthe road."
Elson has
important champions in Delaware.
"He's doing this for all the right
reasons," said R. Franklin Balotti, a corporate lawyer at Richards, Layt;on
& Finger. "Charles genuinely believes that there's a threat of federal
intervention in traditional state corporate law. It's an area of total judgment.
You can't prove him right and can't prove him wrong. But there's nothing wrong
with getting people thinking about it and coming to a decision."
One of
Elson's great strengths is his massive Rolodex that includes people who are
dealing with corporate governance issues in the trenches, said Delaware Supreme
Court Chief Justice Myron Steeie. Elson has his pulse on issues percolating in
the nation that could affect the state, Steeie said. Last year, Elson was named
one of the most influential people in the field of corporate governance by
Directorship magazine. He was listed No. 17 ofthe top 100.
"It seems to
me there's profit in talking about it and being prepared to deal with it,"
Steeie said.
A concem for public interest
Because ofhis sunny
disposition, Elson seems like the guy who would be voted "most popular" in high
school.
But Elson clearly has strong convictions - and he's not afraid
to act on them, say those who have known him for years.
"He cares
passionately about things and what is in the public interest," said 4th Circuit
Court of Appeals Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson HI, who was Elson's former professor.
"He is not selfish in his agenda at aU."
Wilkinson, who employed Elson
as his law clerk, said Elson loves to debate legal matters.
"He's a live
wire," Wilkinson
said. "But he's a total gentleman."
Balotti
said "he's a reaUy caring, wonderful person."
Doreen Kelly Ruyak,
director of msirketing and development with the National Association of
Corporate Directors in Washington, said she frequently asks Elson to participate
in conferences because she wants people who will raise the hard issues. It
doesn't hurt that Elson is a director of AutoZone Inc. and HealthSouth Corp., as
well as an academic, she said.
"There's a lot of difficult decisions for
boards today that go beyond [SEC] compliance," she said. "He's able to speak for
directors. And he will hold his peers accountable."
Elson was a
"contrarian" from his childhood in Atlanta, The oldest son of a wealthy
entrepreneur, Elson was discouraged by his father from going to law school when
he was in prep school at Andover. The senior Elson has gone to law school, but
never practiced.
"I liked the law. He did not," Elson said. "I didn't
take the advice."
While majoring in American history at Harvard, Elson
thought he would be a legal historian. Later, at the University of Virginia
School of Law, he considered being a litigator because he "liked to argue," he
said.
But during a summer internship at a New York City law firm, Elson
came to the conclusion that litigation was "form over substance." After he took
a corporate law course with Levmore, he was hooked on corporate governance.
Once out of law school, Elson worked in mergers and acquisition and
corporate finance at Sullivan & Cromwell in Manhattan. Then one of Elson's
law professors took him aside on a boat trip in Russia and told Elson he was a
natural teacher. The key was to make the jump to academia before it was too hard
to walk away from the money in law. Elson sent out his resume and soon landed a
job teaching corporate law at Stetson University CoUege of Law in Gulfport, Fla.
The story might have ended
there. But life took an abrupt turn
in 1993, when Elson published a paper - against the advice ofa more senior law
professor - that proposed that corporate directors be paid in stock.
"The theory is that director ownership aligns the interest of the
director with the shareholder and breaks the traditional bond between director
and management, which led to inefficient management - or what we caU management
capture," he said.
Performance is questioned
As it tumed out,
Elson tested his theory personally.
In 1996, Elson was approached by the
Sunbeam Corp.'s then chief executive, Al Duniap, who was riding high as
a corporate cost-slasher. Duniap had read Elson's paper about director
stock ownership and thought he would be a good presence on the board.
"To his credit, he wanted a governance advocate," Elson said.
As
a show of commitment to the company and shareholders, Elson bought 5,000 shares
of Simbeam for $100,000. But 18 months into his directorship. Sunbeam suffered
huge losses and the stock tanked. Dunlap's performance was caUed into question.
"It was horrible. He was someone I liked and respected and I had
invested in the company," Elson said.
At a board meeting, it became
apparent something was terribly wrong at the company. Elson attempted to
question Duniap about the problems and the meetmg tumed ugly, Elson said.
Within the week, Elson made the motion to fire Duniap. "He was
speechless," Elson said.
StiU, Sunbeam couldn't be saved from
bankruptcy, and Elson shared the misery of common stockholders. He lost his
$100,000 investment, plus the taxes he paid on his director's eamings in
worthless stock.
"I was there with the shareholders," Elson said. "I
lost my investment and then some."
Life changed again in 1999, when
Elson got a call from the University of Delaware to take a look at the newly
formed corpo-
rate governance center at the University of Delaware.
"My first reaction was not to do it, because there wasn't a law school.
I was a law professor," he said.
Elson came to Delaware and met with the
corporate lawyers and judges. He was quickly sold. Today, he lives with his
wife, Aimee, and two chUdren, Caroline, 8, and Chip, 4, in Westover Hills in
Greenville.
The advantage of having someone of Elson's standmg in
Delaware is that he can bring together the corporate elite for conferences on
pressing issues in corporate governance. In November, for example, he held a
seminar that discussed North Dakota's new shareholder-
friendly
corporate code, among other things.
That kind of lively discussion adds
a lot to the debate, Steeie said.
"He provides the forum for the
dialogue and elevates the issue a little bit higher so it will be on the radar
screen ofthe policymakers," said Bobby Gempesaw, dean ofthe Lemer CoUege of
Business and Economics at the University of Delaware. "When Charles talks about
this issue, it's not just Delaware it's aU over. It sends the message that
instead of just being reactive, we're moving to look at progressive changes."
Contact Maureen Miljord at 324-2SS1 or mTnilford@deUiwareonUne.com.
IMAGINE
A third of state
revenue depends
on
corporate
business. But a
national effort
could
jeopardize
that. M
The News Journal/FRED COMEGYS
"If
you're not challenging people to think, you haven't done your job," said Charles
Elson of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of
Delaware,